Putting bad faith to bed: Wakefit reclaims its domain
April 1, 2025Domain NamesDomain Name Disputes,domain squatting
In a recent decision under the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP), Wakefit Innovations Pvt. Ltd., the Bengaluru-based D2C furniture and sleep solutions company, has successfully secured the transfer of the domain name wakefit.in. The arbitral award dated February 28, 2025, underscores the importance of accurate registrant information and reinforces that cybersquatting - even passive holding of infringing domains will not go unchecked.
Turning down the noise: Bose reclaims its .co.in domain
April 1, 2025Domain NamesDomain Name Disputes,domain squatting
In a significant decision under the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP), Bose Corporation, the globally renowned manufacturer of high-end audio equipment, has successfully reclaimed the domain name boseindia.co.in.
The Jiohotstar Domain saga
November 5, 2024Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Domain Names,Weekly (IP)DATE,IndiaDomain Name,ipr,Intellectual Property Rights,jio,hotstar,domain squatting
The recent domain dispute involving jiohotstar.com has sparked a broader online discussion, highlighting a familiar narrative of “big corporation versus individual.” While some recognized the legal underpinnings of the issue, much of the debate centred on the perception that Reliance Jio should have accommodated the individual’s request. However, this situation exemplifies domain squatting—where individuals/company register internet domains containing well-known brand names or company…
The Evolving Liability of Domain Name Registrars: Snapdeal Private Limited v. Godaddycom LLC and Ors.
October 29, 2024Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Domain Names,Weekly (IP)DATEDomain Name Disputes,trademarks,ipr,Intellectual Property Rights,domain,intermediary liability,Snapdeal Private Limited v. Godaddycom LLC,unfair trade practices,safe habour protection,grievance mechanism
As the digital landscape evolves, the need to hold intermediaries to higher standards of accountability and duty of care has become increasingly pressing. This necessity arises from a growing trend in which intermediaries often overlook instances of infringement occurring on their platforms, to the detriment of the rights owners. With the rapid expansion of online services, intermediaries play a pivotal role and so, it is essential to implement stricter standards and practices that compel them…
Adobe wins permanent injunction and significant damages against cyber squatter
December 15, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Domain Names,IndiaInfringement,Delhi High Court,Cyber Squatting,Domain Names,Damages
The Delhi High Court’s ruling in the case of Adobe Inc. v. Namase Patel and Ors. serves as a reminder of the importance of protecting trademarks and intellectual property rights on the internet. In this case, the court granted a permanent injunction in favour of the Plaintiff. The Court recognised Namase Patel as a habitual cyber squatter and awarded a sum of INR 2,00,01,000/- (approx. US$ 242,000) in damages against the defendant to act as a deterrent against such actions in the future.
INDIA – Lifting of extension of deadlines due to COVID-19
March 8, 2021Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Patents,Industrial Designs,Domain Names,CopyrightsIP India
The Supreme Court indicated that it was proposing to lift the suo moto extension of the limitation period granted by it on account of the COVID-19 pandemic, with effect from March 15 this year. Following this, on 8th March 2021, the Court passed an order ending the extension of the limitation period.
Legal Notices in Intellectual Property Right cases: A slippery slope?
November 19, 2020Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Patents,Industrial Designs,Domain Names,CopyrightsInfringement,Protection
More often than not, when a “bona fide” proprietor of the trademark (I use the term “bona fide” rather loosely here) finds unauthorized use of their mark by a third party, the first step taken (often) is to send the other party a legal notice. While some legal notices sent/received are convoluted and packed with legal jargon, some are brief and get the message across. A legal notice simply outlines the rights of the sender (“bona fide” proprietor) and cautions the infringing party to refrain…
Amendments brought about to INDRP for .in domain disputes
October 19, 2020Domain NamesINDRP,Domain Name Disputes
The National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) has notified certain changes to the INDRP Rules of Procedure. The new policy is aimed at streamlining the INDRP process, making it easier for rights holders to protect and enforce their rights against unauthorized registration of .in domains or .in domain squatting.
Conflicting ‘Ventures’ of Domain Names
July 15, 2019Domain NamesDomain Name Disputes,NIXI,Domain Name
The current case is a classic story of conscious copying of the domain name. Before proceeding further, dealing with the meaning and definition of the word domain name is important. Domain name is the name of the website. In simple words, just like how every person is attributed with a specific and unique name, similarly, the websites too have a name of their own! And this ‘name’ is called as the Domain Name.
Cybersquatting and Fraud – Delhi HC Grants Injunctive Relief to Colgate Palmolive
June 21, 2019Intellectual Property Rights,Domain Namesinternet,NIXI,cyber-sqatting,Delhi HC
In a case of fraud, the High Court of Delhi has recently cracked down on unidentified persons who solicited money deposits in the garb of job interviews for a position in Colgate Palmolive Company. In two orders dated 12 April and 15 May, 2019, the High Court of Delhi has ordered an ex parte ad interim injunction against unnamed defendants, after Colgate Palmolive filed a suit.