An Overview of Standard Essential Patents
September 9, 2019Trademarksintellectual property,MAX,SEP,FRAND
Did you know that there is an entire system that dictates the quality and features of technological devices, which everyone in the industry has to follow? This is the world of Standard Essential Patents, where technological development and trade are slowly but surely getting choked by the whims and fancies of their inventors, who know how to throw their weight about especially without the sufficient restraints of law.
As Vistara Takes off –Legally
September 9, 2019TrademarksInfringement,trademarks,intellectual property,TATA,Vistara
It is of common knowledge that planes fly by taking off, but sometimes they just have to take off in the other sense of the word! Rightfully!
Infringement & the Essential Feature of a Trademark
September 3, 2019TrademarksInfringement,trademarks,intellectual property,MSME,MAX
The importance of a Trademark and the benefits it confers on a business entity cannot in any manner be overlooked. A dispute arose between Max Healthcare Institute Limited and Shahrudya Health Care Private Limited, the Plaintiffs and Defendants respectively.
Trademark Pulse pulses the Deceptively similar Pulser
August 7, 2019TrademarksInfringement,trade dress,India,intellectual property
The business was with respect to hard boiled candies and the trademark had gradually acquired popularity among the public since then. The candies under the tradename PULSE were sold in various flavours inter alia were Kaccha Aam, Guava and Orange and it was packed in a unique way having distinct layout, get up and colour scheme.
No Moral Rights over Destruction of a Work: Delhi High Court
July 29, 2019TrademarksDelhi HC,Copyrights,India,intellectual property
In the world of construction, an architect holds a remarkable position. An architect quite often turns to be the ultimate decision maker on any project, a question then arises would that give, the architect, as the creator and legal ‘author’ of a building a ‘right to object’ to the modification or destruction of their work by the owner of the building? In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has answered the question in negative.
The Curious Case of ‘Legal Fakes’
July 1, 2019Trademarkslegal fakes,Supreme
A classic examples of legal fakes is the case of Supreme Italia, a company that has established its presence depending solely on the concept of legal fakes. The strategy that was adopted by the brand was to simply target the less informed customers into believing that it was dealing in products that were from the original brand Supreme.
Adidas Losses Battle Over its Three-Stripe Trademark
June 24, 2019Intellectual Property Rights,TrademarksEuropean Union,pattern mark,figurative marks
The name Adidas is not new, and neither are its products. But in a major twist and what appears to be a blow, the European Court has ruled that the “three stripes” brand/trademark of Adidas was not distinctive enough.
Exploring the Not-Very-Common Provisions of Section 9
June 19, 2019Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarksabsolute grounds,Section 9
Section 9 per se is not an easy provision to get through, laying down several criteria for determining if a trademark is entitled to be accepted. While Section 9(1) is the most common provision one can perceive in an examination report, Section 9(2) is a provision which leaves no stones unturned.
No Removal of Registered Mark for Non-Renewal Without Notice; Delhi HC Rules… Yet Again
June 15, 2019Intellectual Property Rights,TrademarksRenewal,O-3 notice,High Court,Delhi,Removal,25(3)
Justice Midha, in his order dated May 28, 2019, reiterated the mandatory nature of Section 25(3) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. As we have noted before, the Registrar is obligated to send a notice regarding the expiry of validity of a mark to its proprietor, before the said expiry.
India’s Accession to WIPO Agreements – A Step Towards Knowledge Driven Economy
June 11, 2019Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Industrial DesignsWIPO,Nice,Vienna,Locarno,agreement
The three WIPO Agreements have received accession from the Indian Government.[1]The three Agreements were introduced through the WIPO treaties primarily to ease the search for trademarks and industrial designs. In this arena it is significant to understand the prominence of all the three Agreements. A brief understanding of all the three Agreements are as follows:
