Practice what you preach, especially if you’re an IP Lawyer
November 18, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,IndiaInfringement,Delhi HC
In an interesting turn of events, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of Sujata Chaudhri of Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys in a trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off suit restricting another intellectual property lawyer Swarupa Ghosh from using a deceptively similar logo.
Pre-Litigation mediation in Intellectual Property matters in India
November 15, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Patents,Industrial Designs,Copyrights,IndiaCommercial Disputes,Mediation
The Court held that in an intellectual property case, where the matter affects not only the disputants but also the consumers and the plaintiff has already exhausted all possible recourses to amicably resolve the matter, then the plaintiff’s application seeking exemption from instituting pre-litigation mediation proceedings in accordance with section 12-A of the Act can be allowed. Thus, it can be said that in intellectual property cases, such reliefs are granted by Courts not merely for the…
Pre-Litigation Mediation in Commercial Disputes in India
November 9, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Patents,Industrial Designs,Copyrights,Indiaintellectual property,Commercial Disputes,Mediation
Alternate methods of dispute resolution are amicable methods of resolving disputes without the intervention of courts. It decreases the burden of the courts and encourages settlement proceedings among the parties. Generally, Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) uses one or more neutral third parties who help the parties to communicate, discuss the differences and resolve the dispute. ADRs are a set of methods that enable individuals and group to maintain cooperation, and social order and provides…
FLY HIGH vs FLY HIGHER, Delhi High Court Decides Upon Infringement of a mark not being used as a Trademark
November 3, 2022Trademarks,IndiaInfringement,Passing off,trademarks
The Delhi High Court’s Justice Jyoti Singh vide her order dated October 28, 2022 has vacated an ex-parte ad interim injunction (dated January 21, 2022) against Tata Sia Airlines for using the mark ‘Fly Higher’ in their promotional campaigns. Justice Singh in her order has deliberated the question of whether the registration of the trademark 'Fly High’ by the plaintiff could prevent the defendant from using the phrase 'Fly Higher' in their promotional campaigns.
Trademark renewal in Pakistan
April 27, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Pakistantrademarks,intellectual property,pakista
A trademark in Pakistan can be renewed for a period of 10 years. A request to renew a trademark in Pakistan should be made at any time during 6 months before the expiry of the trademark.
Maintaining a Trademark in Sri Lanka
April 18, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Sri LankaRenewal,trademarks,intellectual property,srilanka
A trademark once registered in Sri Lanka, is valid for a period of 10 years from the date of filing of the application or from the date of last renewal, as the case maybe.
Moment Marketing and its legal implications
April 5, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Indiatrademarks,intellectual property,Advertising
The power of the internet, in particular that of social media is humungous. People are constantly tied to their phones, eyeing for any latest news that may spring up, be it in the form of a tweet, a meme or a viral video. So, when used strategically, social media rather becomes one of the most powerful tools of digital marketing. With the evolution of social media, the concept of moment marketing has also become increasingly common. But what exactly is moment marketing? It is marketing in…
Case Brief: Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd – IP Infringement or Global Medical Crises?
April 2, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,IndiaInfringement,Passing off,Copyright Infringement,trademarks
Recently, the Madras High Court, in the case of Sun Pharmaceuticals (Applicant/Defendant) v Cipla Ltd (Respondent/Plaintiff) refused to vacate the interim injunction against the Applicant. The Plaintiff, Cipla Ltd, was seeking directions against Sun Pharma, claiming that the Defendant was selling medicines under the mark “Respule” which was alleged to be deceptively similar to the marks “Budecort Respules”,“Duolin Respules” and “Respules” of the Plaintiff. Cipla Ltd brought in an action for…
The much needed check: An order of the Delhi High Court
March 30, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Indiatrademarks,India,intellectual property
In a welcome move, the Delhi High Court ordered that trademark applications' whose opposition period would have expired during the suspension period shall stand extended till May 30, 2022. Accordingly, the registration certificates issued during this period will also stand suspended till May 30, 2022.
Groundless threat of trademark infringement: Is Section 142 a means to combat trademark bullying?
March 29, 2022Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Indiatrademarks,intellectual property,trademark bullying
The law of trademarks firmly establishes that a trademark owner reserves the exclusive right to use the trademark and enforce the same. However, there are instances when economically stronger entities or large corporations aggressively secure their intellectual property against, mostly, smaller entities without any justifiable grounds. Through this, the former aims to monopolize the market and kick out any remotely similar business operating under the mark. This is often perceived as a means of…