Indian Patent Office reiterates on biological material deposition before making patent application
In its notification on July 2, 2014, the Indian Patent Office (IPO) forewarns patent applicants the consequences of not depositing a sample of the biological material with an International Depository Authority (IDA).
Trademark Injunctions and Damages in India – Part Three
In my earlier posts (here and here), I discussed the position of law on injunctions, the requirements for grant of temporary injunction and relevant cases with respect to trademarks in India. So let’s assume that we managed to restrain the defendants from using our trademark, what next? We want the defendants to pay (literally) for what they did and compensate our losses, to the maximum possible extent. This sum of money claimed as compensation for loss or injury is what we refer to as damages.…
Copyright – Performers Rights in India
You’ve probably come across that Shakespearean quote several times in your life. Shakespeare is one of those people that everyone knows of because you just ought to (to seem knowledgeable during small talk at the very least). What you may not know in the context of Copyright is that none of his works were protected under the law of Copyright (probably why my school staged his plays for several years without worrying about rights). The Statute of Anne which was the Act which brought in copyright…
Tirunelveli or Irruttukadai Halwa – GI or Trademark
The year 2014 has witnessed a lot of goods entering the family of Geographical Indicators ( GI ). Goods such as Madurai Malli (jasmine), Pattamadai Pai (Pattamadai mat), Nachiarkoil Kuthuvilakku (Nachiarkoil lamp), Toda Embroidery, Thanjavur Veena and Chettinad Kottan (palmyra basketry) have all become a part of the GI family thus bringing Tamil Nadu with the second highest number of registered GIs in the country; A total of 24.
IPAB makes the Indian Patent Office see the importance of doing things right the first time
In a spate of orders recently (see here, here and here), the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has asked the Indian Patent Office (IPO) to consider those matters afresh because the IPO’s orders lacked reasoning.
Trademark Injunctions and Damages in India – Part Two
In my last post, I dealt with the first condition i.e. ‘prima facie case’ to be established when praying for a grant of temporary injunction. It is only when all the three conditions are fulfilled that the Court will take into consideration the prayer of temporary injunction. As in the case of prima facie, the other two conditions can be best explained with reference to principles and tests laid down by the Courts. However, there is no straight jacket formula to ascertain whether they exist or…
Copyright and Music – 5 Things Bands need to keep in mind
Tripping on tangled mass of wires, feeling my head reverberate with the sound of music, coffee, beer and smoke breaks was a part of my life for a few years. I used to sing for a band and for several music shows before I turned to the dark side and settled in on a career in Law. Whether it was cover versions or own compositions, life was simple, we performed what we felt like and performed it proudly in public (if given the chance) not concerned with protecting what was ours or defining rights.
The Tea Board vs ITC Limited – Going overboard with GI
The Tea Board of India holds the famous GI “Darjeeling” and the logo of a woman holding tea leaves, as well as the certification trade mark “Darjeeling” under the Trade Marks Act, in connection with “tea”. ITC, Limited used “Darjeeling Lounge” as the name for its executive lounge at its Kolkata hotel, the ITC Sonar. The Tea Board had previously filed a suit against ITC for using the word Darjeeling for their lounge. The suit mainly revolved on issues of infringement of the GI and the…
Celebrity Rights in India: AMMA – The Mother of all Trademarks?
Cases and issues relating to personality and image rights in connection with trademark law have always intrigued me. For one, it raises the question of whether a person can register their name as a trademark solely on the ground that they are a celebrity having brand value and that their reputation is likely be injured otherwise. Unless of course they are using their name for the purpose of sale of goods and providing any services. An example that strikes me is that of Sachin Tendulkar who has…