Planning to attend the 141st INTA annual meeting in Boston? Read on.
January 28, 2015Intellectual Property RightsINTA
I originally wrote this post before the the 136th INTA annual meeting in Hong Kong (1st INTA annual meeting in Asia). Folks who have been attending the INTA meetings will agree as to how awesome it can be and yet tiring, which requires careful planning. I thought of putting down a few of my insights that can be useful in planning your INTA trip.
Planning To do Trademark Registration? This Is For You!
Planning to file do trademark registration but would like to know more about it before taking the plunge? Here are a few pointers.
Non Disclosure Agreements – Tell me what the secret is and I’ll tell you if it was a secret.
January 20, 2015Intellectual Property Rights
I’d written about Trade Secrets a while back, and the only way to protect those secrets in India, (barring not revealing them to another soul) is through Non Disclosure Agreements (NDAs).Non Disclosure Agreements are basically agreements signed between two people or entities which put down in writing that confidential information is being passed from one person to another, the nature of the information, the purpose and most importantly an undertaking from the person receiving the information…
Court rules on dispute relating to trademark assignment
Assignment of trademarks is a process in which the owner of the trademark transfers the ownership of the mark either with or without the goodwill of the business. We had earlier written about the procedure for assigning trademarks and also the key points that should be incorporated in an assignment deed from a practical perspective. There are times when assignment of trademarks can be complicated - rights to a particular trademark are jointly owned by two or more companies or when the rights…
To do or not to do – Validity of the registration of a trademark at an interlocutory stage
January 20, 2015Intellectual Property Rights
Recently, the Bombay High Court heard two appeals together to rule on the same point of law, i.e., whether the Court could go into the question of validity of the registration of a trade mark at an interlocutory stage when the defendant takes up the defense of invalidity of registration of the plaintiff’s trademark in an suit of infringement.
Amendment to the Design Rules in India
January 8, 2015Industrial Designs
The Controller of Patents, Designs and Trademarks recently through a public notice dated January 2, 2015 brought to the notice of the public that the Design rules have been amended with effect from December 30, 2014.
First Draft of the National IPR Policy – What lies ahead for IP in India?
January 8, 2015Intellectual Property Rights
The first draft of the National IPR Policy dated December 19, 2014 was made available to the public amidst all the curiosity regarding the content of this policy and also the controversy concerning the basis of selection of the members of the Think Tank. We had earlier written about how the Think Tank came into being and the tasks that were entrusted to the panel. The DIPP Public Notice of November 13, 2014 had called upon interested persons to submit their comments on the National IPR…
India’s first Semi-Conductor Integrated Circuit Layout Design Application
January 7, 2015Industrial Designs
A couple of months back we’d written about the basics of protection of Semi-Conductor Integrated Circuit Layout Design (SICLD) in India and more importantly how there hadn’t been a single application filed, or registered till date.
Trademark Application Status “Opposed” – Explained
One of the important statuses in respect of a trademark, shown in the website of the Trademark Office is “opposed,” for the registration of the said mark becomes dependent on the outcome of the said opposition. The term “opposed” means that a third party, has found the mark objectionable primarily in light of Section 9 or 11 or both (and any other provisions of the Trademarks Act), intimates the same in writing to the Trademark Office and requests for its refusal. Section 21 of the Trademarks…
All I want for Christmas is ‘not’ Yu – Delhi High Court vacates the injunction against OnePlus
December 26, 2014Intellectual Property RightsInfringement,News
Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the antagonist. And with due apology to Cyanogen: it is the villain says the Delhi High Court in its last judgment before Winter Vacation.