Who does not love chocolates?But the British in America do not seem to be in for “any” chocolate; much to their dismay though.
America’s leading confectionery giant Hershey, over a matter of trademark infringement, has brought about the ban of imported (U.K) Cadbury chocolates in U.S.A. It is pertinent to note that Hershey holds the license to manufacture and sell Cadbury chocolates in U.S.A and the importation of U.K Cadbury chocolates has consequently not gone down well with it on the ground that it would only lead to confusion. But the likelihood of confusion alleged by Hershey’s does not end there. The ban also extends to the Yorkie chocolates (Nestle) on the grounds that they could be confused with Hershey’s York peppermint patty and Toffee crisps (Nestle) on the grounds that their packaging was very much similar to that of Hershey’s Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups(both appear to be orange).
The British in the U.S, in my personal opinion, would have borne the ban better if the recipes of the Cadbury chocolates manufactured in U.S (by Hershey)and U.K had been the same. But allegedly, there is a difference in the recipes and that seems to change everything!
Of course, Hershey’s actions are accounted as defense against trademark infringement and that it has to prevent consumers from getting confused or misled. But not everyone in the U.S seem to get over the U.K Cadbury!
Related Posts:
- Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting
- Sony’s trademark infringement suit dismissed after 20 years for technical defects
- Infringement of a trademark also depends upon the similarity between the target customers
- Trademark Infringement and Jurisdiction – What it means to carry on business
- Class of purchasers and trademark infringement
- Punitive Damages denied for Trademark Infringement
Raja Selvam
Founder & Managing Attorney, Selvam & Selvam | Practice areas include Trademarks, Patents, Domain names & Business law. Visiting faculty, Department of Journalism, Madras University where I teach copyrights & trademarks law. Passionate about entrepreneurship, start-ups, stocks, farming, technology and law.
No Automatic Abandonment for Delay in Filing Evidence: Madras High Court Brings Clarity to Rules 45 & 46 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017
Recently, the Madras High Court in the case of ACE Foods Private Limited vs The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr (CMA(TM) No. 22 of 2025), dealt with…
Celebrity Rights in India: AMMA – The Mother of all Trademarks?
Cases and issues relating to personality and image rights in connection with trademark law have always intrigued me. For one, it raises the question…
Case Brief: Sun Pharmaceuticals v. Cipla Ltd – IP Infringement or Global Medical Crises?
Recently, the Madras High Court, in the case of Sun Pharmaceuticals (Applicant/Defendant) v Cipla Ltd (Respondent/Plaintiff) refused to vacate the…
