Recent DOI Trademark Notices in Nepal: What Applicants and Brand Owners Need to Know
February 3, 2026Intellectual Property Rights,Weekly (IP)DATENepal,Department of Industry,DOI notices,Use requirement nepal
Recent civil unrest in Nepal, coupled with a series of consecutive notices issued by the Department of Industry (DOI) regarding pending and registered trademarks has created uncertainty for trademark applicants and brand owners. Questions around applicable deadlines, documentation requirements and trademark use obligations have understandably caused concern. Here’s what you need to know -
India’s Proposed Changes to Design Law: What You Should Know
February 2, 2026Intellectual Property Rights,Industrial Designs,Weekly (IP)DATEintellectual property,Design Amendments,Amendment,Designs Act,DPIIT concept note
India is considering major amendments to its design law under the Designs Act, 2000. These changes reflect India’s attempt to modernize its legal framework, address digital innovation, and align with international design systems. For applicants & IP lawyers, these reforms will directly impact how designs are protected, filed, and enforced in India. Below is a practical explanation of what is changing, how the current system works, and why it matters.
DPIIT’s proposed One Nation – One License – One Payment policy: What does it mean for the content creators & Artists?
January 28, 2026Intellectual Property Rights,Copyrights,Weekly (IP)DATEartificial intelligence,copyright,DPIIT,Artists,Content creators
In view of recent AI developments and increasing concerns around the use of copyrighted works for AI training, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) formed a committee to examine how India’s copyright framework should respond. Accordingly, DPIIT recently released a working paper proposing a hybrid model of One Nation – One License – One Payment policy. This blog explores what it means for content creators & Artists.
3D shape marks can now attain ‘Well-known’ status in India: Does your brand qualify for the enhanced protection?
December 19, 2025Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Weekly (IP)DATE,Indiashape mark,intellectual property,Trademark,well-known shape mark,Birkins well known mark,3D mark
Brand owners generally obtain protection for aesthetic features of their products under the Design Act, however, obtaining protection as a shape mark under the Trade Marks law (when it acts as a source identifier) awards indefinite protection (renewable every 10 years) and significantly strengthens brand protection. Particularly, shape marks offer effective solutions against counterfeits, stopping others from using a confusingly similar shape even if the infringer claims their product is…
Protecting Identity in an Era of AI
December 4, 2025Intellectual Property Rights,Weekly (IP)DATEartificial intelligence,Personality Rights,impersonation
Artificial intelligence has advanced to the point where synthesized voices are no longer only a fantastical novelty, but practical tools carrying commercial value in entertainment, news, advertising and accessibility solutions. With only a few minutes of recorded audio, today’s AI systems can construct an uncannily accurate replica of a real person’s voice. These are innovations with immense potential such as to help people who cannot speak verbally still communicate, allow for multilingual…
India Accepts Its First Smell Mark – Can Your Brand Register One?
December 4, 2025Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Weekly (IP)DATE,Indiaintellectual property,ipr,Trademark,Smell mark,Olfactory mark,Indian registry
The Indian Trade Marks Registry has, for the first time, accepted a smell trademark for a rose-scented tyre filed by Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd., which is now published for advertisement. Smell marks can significantly enhance brand recall value and customer experience, acting as a strong identifier. Further, once accepted, such marks are difficult to oppose or cancel, making them a valuable long-term IP asset. If your brands use a distinctive fragrance (for products or packaging), now may…
Maldives Enacts Modern Trademark Regime: What Rights Holders Need to Know About the New Trademarks Act
December 3, 2025Trademarks,Weekly (IP)DATE,MaldivesMaldives,intellectual property,ipr,Trademark,Law No. 2/2019,Cautionary notice
The Maldives has taken a major step toward strengthening its intellectual-property framework with the introduction of the Trademarks Act. For the first time, the country will operate a comprehensive, statutory trademark registration system, replacing the reliance on cautionary notices and unregistered-rights principles. For businesses operating in or entering the Maldives, the Act significantly enhances the certainty, enforceability, and clarity of trademark rights. Below is an overview of the…
FAQs – Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 & Rules, 2025
December 3, 2025Weekly (IP)DATEData Privacy,Data Protection,DPDP Act,DPDP Rules,Data Fiduciary,Data principal
Data Protection has become a critical priority for businesses and individuals alike. With the recent developments and updates in how personal digital data can be collected, stored and safeguarded, we have answered the most common questions to help you navigate data protection.
Intellectual Property and Caste-Based Atrocities
March 19, 2025Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Weekly (IP)DATE,Indiaintellectual property,ipr,caste-based attrocity,Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989,Section 173 of the CrPC
The Supreme Court recently upheld the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Kshipra Kamlesh Uke & Ors., involving compensation for intellectual property loss under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (“the Act”) and its associated Rules of 1995 (“the Rules”). While the Act is primarily intended to protect victims of atrocities by offering relief in cases of death, injury, or ‘damage to…
Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay Rs. 339 Crore Damages: A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Giants on Counterfeit Goods
February 28, 2025Intellectual Property Rights,Trademarks,Weekly (IP)DATE,IndiaInfringement,Amazon,trademarks,intellectual property,ipr,ecommerce,intermediary liability,Information Technology Act
In a landmark ruling on February 25, 2025, the Delhi High court ordered Amazon to pay a hefty Rs. 339.25 crore in compensatory damages for the sale of counterfeit Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) goods on its platform. This case highlights the intersection of trademark law and e-commerce regulation, raising questions about the accountability of online marketplaces in protecting brand integrity. The Plaintiffs LifeStyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B, V, who are the rightful owners of the…
