Intellectual Property and Caste-Based Atrocities

The Supreme Court recently upheld the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Kshipra Kamlesh Uke & Ors., involving compensation for intellectual property loss under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (“the Act”) and its associated Rules of 1995 (“the Rules”). While the Act is primarily intended to protect victims of atrocities by offering relief in cases of death, injury, or ‘damage to…

Read More


Delhi High Court Orders Amazon to Pay Rs. 339 Crore Damages: A Wake-Up Call for E-Commerce Giants on Counterfeit Goods

In a landmark ruling on February 25, 2025, the Delhi High court ordered Amazon to pay a hefty Rs. 339.25 crore in compensatory damages for the sale of counterfeit Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) goods on its platform. This case highlights the intersection of trademark law and e-commerce regulation, raising questions about the accountability of online marketplaces in protecting brand integrity. The Plaintiffs LifeStyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B, V, who are the rightful owners of the…

Read More


Trademark turbulence: Interglobe Aviation Vs Mahindra Electric Automobile Ltd

In a recent dispute between India’s largest airline, IndiGo, and automobile manufacturer Mahindra Electric, (Interglobe Aviation Vs Mahindra Electric Automobile Ltd, DHC - CS(COMM) 1073 / 2024) the issue surrounded the alpha numeral “6E”. For IndiGo, the 6E callsign has been an integral element of the official designator and a brand identifier for the past 18 years. IndiGo has extended the use of "6E" across various service offerings, such as 6E Prime, 6E Flex, 6E Link, and 6E Add-ons. Notably,…

Read More


The Jiohotstar Domain saga

The recent domain dispute involving jiohotstar.com has sparked a broader online discussion, highlighting a familiar narrative of “big corporation versus individual.” While some recognized the legal underpinnings of the issue, much of the debate centred on the perception that Reliance Jio should have accommodated the individual’s request. However, this situation exemplifies domain squatting—where individuals/company register internet domains containing well-known brand names or company…

Read More


Coexistence of Similar Pharmaceutical Names: An Analysis of Judicial Interpretation

Trademarks provide an advantage to businesses by distinguishing one’s product from others. However, it is common for infringers to use a similar mark in the industry and try to reap the goodwill that the initial user had secured over years. The pharma industry too faces the issue of similar marks being branded and sold. In this industry, the trademarks not only play a crucial role in distinguishing the marks but also ensures consumer safety. The recurring issue that we as trademark attorneys…

Read More


The Evolving Liability of Domain Name Registrars: Snapdeal Private Limited v. Godaddycom LLC and Ors.

As the digital landscape evolves, the need to hold intermediaries to higher standards of accountability and duty of care has become increasingly pressing. This necessity arises from a growing trend in which intermediaries often overlook instances of infringement occurring on their platforms, to the detriment of the rights owners. With the rapid expansion of online services, intermediaries play a pivotal role and so, it is essential to implement stricter standards and practices that compel them…

Read More


The Great Indian Copyright Conundrum: Goa’s Circular on Wedding Music and the Legal Tug-of-War

Goa, with its stunning beaches and lively festivities, has always been a popular destination for weddings and social events. However, a recent circular from the Goa government has stirred up a legal battle regarding copyright laws. This circular aimed to exempt wedding ceremonies and related festivities from the need to secure copyright permissions for musical works, citing the need to support local economic and tourism activities. But, as expected, this move has faced strong backlash from…

Read More


Want to Remix a Song? Make sure not to get tangled with IP Infringement

In this era of Millennials and Gen Z, Spotify and other music apps seems to be the go-to platform, with everyone tuning in to music. From vibing to popular tracks to setting the trends on Instagram reels, music has been intertwined into everyone’s life so much that even common people are involved in the trends industry. A significant aspect of this trend is the rise of song remixes, which, now accessible to anyone, have also led to an increase in IP infringement issues – particularly copyright…

Read More


Analysis of Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 – An IPR Perspective

The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 which came into effect recently on August 1, 2024 has garnered significant attention across the country. The Act, having brought amendments to various Acts of our legislation, including those related to Intellectual Property (IP) and media laws among others, primarily aims to decriminalise the provisions – aiming to shift from punitive measures like imprisonment to more lenient penalties such as fines and pecuniary penalties.

Read More


Law and Disorder: IP Firms Targeted by Sneaky Impersonation Scams

Recently, a troubling trend has emerged where scammers are impersonating reputable law firms, pretending to be partners or representatives to defraud individuals and businesses. Their modus operandi involves targeting people with fake "legal notices" sent from email addresses that closely resemble legitimate ones, or through WhatsApp accounts using photos of the firm's partners as display pictures. By employing these deceptive tactics, they falsely accuse individuals or businesses of violating…

Read More