Insights

Protect Your IP Before You Disclose It

Disclose an unprotected invention to a joint venture partner and you may spend years proving it was yours — years a startup does not have. Protection before disclosure is the difference between owning an asset and litigating over one.

Archana Priyadharshini · Published 26 September 2017 · Updated 14 August 2026 · Reviewed by Selvam & Selvam

You can protect your intellectual property, or you can wait for somebody else to protect it — in their name. For a startup, the gap between those two outcomes is usually a disclosure made in good faith before anything was filed.

Why it matters more for a startup

The question applies to anyone, but it is sharper for a startup: new to an industry, trying to make its efforts count, and often built around IP. The zeal for the business is there; a clear view of what the IP means for it frequently is not.

A startup’s IP may be a newly invented know-how or invention that the business runs on, the brand that is its identity, or creative content — literary, dramatic, cinematographic, artistic or sound recording work. In every case the business revolves around that IP, and managing and protecting it may decide whether the venture stands.

What disclosure without protection costs

Take an example. Suppose you have invented a machine that transports a person from one place to another in moments. You intend to commercialise it, enter a joint venture, and disclose the details of the technology in good faith without reservation.

One day you find the other party no longer needs you in the project — and is already using the technology, claiming ownership of it. You can fight that legally. It will take years, by which time your startup will in all probability have turned to dust.

That asymmetry is the whole point. The counterparty can absorb a long dispute; the startup usually cannot. Litigation is not a substitute for protection when one side can outlast the other.

A second example. You create a brand, and the business revolves around it, but registration slips your mind. Then a strikingly similar mark appears. Without registration, you must battle to prove you are the bona fide owner and were genuinely using the mark first.

The burden of proof is the real difference

That last point deserves emphasis, because it is the most concrete benefit of registration.

Where you hold a registration and a third party uses a deceptively similar mark, a suit for infringement requires you to prove deceptive similarity. Where the mark is unregistered, only a passing off action is available — and there you must prove goodwill and reputation, misrepresentation, and likely deception or confusion, in addition to similarity.

Registration does not merely give you a right. It removes the hardest thing to prove — that the mark is yours — from the list of things you must establish.

The reasons in short

  1. Your IP is your brainchild, and deserves protection for that reason alone.
  2. The business may depend on it — the startup may have sprung from the IP, or come to rely on an invention, a trademark or original content. Protecting it is necessary just to keep the business running.
  3. It can generate revenue — royalties from licensing, or franchising. Continued protection is what keeps that income from ceasing.
  4. Disclosure without protection means litigation — time-consuming, financially crushing, and mentally exhausting for a young company.

Take the effort to protect the IP as soon as it is created, rather than disclosing it and scrambling to hold on to it afterwards.

Protection doesn’t end at registration

Whether a patent, trademark, copyright or design, the process does not stop once the right is granted.

Renewal, where applicable, is essential — and missing it is among the most avoidable ways to lose a right.

Beyond that, you must stay vigilant that nobody hijacks or infringes it — through similar technology, a deceptively similar mark, or a similar work. This is usually entrusted to IP counsel, better placed to identify what threatens the right. And the advantage of having registered is that in any resulting action you do not need to prove title, which is the point most contested and hardest to establish.

The takeaways

  • Protect before you disclose — especially before a joint venture or partnership.
  • Litigation favours whoever can outlast the other — rarely the startup.
  • Registration removes proving ownership from the things you must establish.
  • Protection is continuous — renewals and watching, not a one-off filing.

Frequently asked questions

Why protect IP before disclosing it? Because once disclosed without protection, establishing ownership means litigation — which takes years a startup usually cannot survive.

What is the difference between infringement and passing off? Infringement requires a registration and proof of deceptive similarity. Passing off, for unregistered marks, additionally requires proving goodwill, misrepresentation and likely confusion.

Does protection end once the IP is registered? No — renewals must be kept up, and the right must be watched for infringement. Protection is a continuous process.

What IP might a startup hold? Inventions and know-how, brands and trademarks, and creative content including literary, artistic, cinematographic and sound recording work.

Useful official resources

Related reading