Insights

A New Owner Can Claim the Mark's Original First-Use Date: Pidilite's M-SEAL

When you acquire a trademark, you acquire its history too. The Bombay High Court let Pidilite claim M-SEAL's use from 1968 — its predecessor's date — and injuncted the deceptively similar R-SEAL obtained by fraudulent concealment.

Raja Pannir Selvam · Published 15 December 2022 · Updated 14 August 2026 · Reviewed by Selvam & Selvam

Buy a trademark and you buy its history. The Bombay High Court let Pidilite claim use of M-SEAL from 1968 — the date of its predecessor — and injuncted a deceptively similar mark that had been registered by hiding the earlier rights from the Registrar.

The dispute

Pidilite Industries Ltd sued the defendant for infringing its registered mark M-SEAL by using R-SEAL. Pidilite won: the court found the defendant had obtained its trademark by fraudulently concealing the existence of Pidilite’s prior registered marks from the Registrar of Trade Marks.

Inheriting the predecessor’s first-use date

The defendant argued Pidilite couldn’t claim use since 1968 or registration from 1972, because the mark was then registered in the name of Pidilite’s predecessors. The court rejected that: Pidilite was entitled to claim user rights in M-SEAL from 1968 even though it hadn’t registered the mark in its own name — because it had acquired the mark and its associated goodwill from its predecessors.

That’s the key principle: assignment carries the mark’s accrued use and goodwill. A subsequent owner steps into the predecessor’s shoes and can rely on the original first-use date.

Deceptive similarity and bad faith

The court found R-SEAL deceptively similar to M-SEAL, likely to cause consumer confusion, and infringing under the Trade Marks Act. It rejected the defendant’s claim of bona fide use since 1999 — unsurprising, given the finding of fraudulent concealment.

The relief

The court injuncted the defendant from using R-SEAL or any identical/similar mark, and — because the dispute also touched the M-SEAL label artwork — from infringing Pidilite’s copyright in that artistic work by reproducing or copying it on their products.

The takeaways

  • A new owner inherits first-use rights. Acquire a mark and its goodwill, and you can claim the predecessor’s first-use date.
  • Registration in your own name isn’t required to rely on acquired user rights, where the assignment transferred the goodwill.
  • Concealing prior marks is fraud — a registration obtained by hiding earlier rights is vulnerable.
  • Label artwork carries copyright too — enforcement can cover both the mark and its get-up.

Frequently asked questions

Can a new trademark owner claim the original first-use date? Yes — where the mark and its goodwill were acquired from a predecessor, the new owner can claim use from the predecessor’s original date, as Pidilite did for M-SEAL from 1968.

Do I have to register an acquired mark in my own name to enforce it? Not to rely on acquired user rights — the Bombay HC allowed Pidilite to claim use even before registering M-SEAL in its own name, because it had acquired the goodwill.

What happens if a mark was registered by concealing earlier marks? That’s fraudulent concealment; the registration is vulnerable, and the court found R-SEAL was obtained this way.

Can label artwork be protected alongside the trademark? Yes — the court also restrained copying of the copyright in the M-SEAL label’s artistic work.

Legislation referred to

  • The Trade Marks Act, 1999

Related reading