Insights

Trademark Infringement and Its Remedies in India

What counts as trademark infringement in India, who can sue, and what remedies exist? A clear rundown of the essential conditions, the civil, criminal and administrative remedies (injunctions, Anton Piller orders, damages), and why vigilance is the owner's job.

Published 27 June 2018 · Updated 14 August 2026 · Reviewed by Selvam & Selvam

A trademark is only as strong as your ability to enforce it. Here’s what counts as infringement in India, who can sue, and the remedies — civil, criminal and administrative — the law provides.

When is a trademark infringed?

Registration is a prerequisite for an infringement action. The essential conditions:

  • the impugned mark is identical or deceptively similar to the registered mark;
  • the goods/services are covered by the registration;
  • the use is in the course of trade; and
  • the use is in a manner likely to be taken as trademark use.

Infringement also arises from various identity/similarity combinations — identity of mark with similarity of goods, similarity of mark with identity of goods, identity with identity, use of a reputed mark, a trade name similar to the mark, unauthorised labelling/packaging, or advertising that takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to the mark’s reputation. The Act also covers using the registered mark as a trade name for the same goods, in deceptive advertising, or even orally.

Who can sue?

The registered proprietor, their legal heirs, registered users and assignees. A passing-off suit can be converted into a combined infringement and passing-off action if registration is obtained before the final hearing.

Remedies

1. Civil remedies — a court not lower than a District Court can grant:

  • interlocutory (temporary) injunctions;
  • Anton Piller orders (to preserve/seize infringing material);
  • damages; and
  • account of profits.

2. Criminal proceedings — complaints can be filed against infringers; civil and criminal actions can run simultaneously.

3. Administrative remediesopposing a deceptively similar mark’s registration, or seeking its removal through the Trade Marks Registry.

Burden of proof

The plaintiff must prove the essential features were copied, with the onus on the plaintiff to prove deception.

Vigilance: the owner’s job

Trademark law now protects at every stage — but users must be reasonably aware of existing marks before registering, and no one may use similar marks that deceive or confuse consumers. Crucially, owners must vigilantly monitor for similar marks, including well-known marks beyond national boundaries. Protection exists, but enforcement starts with watchfulness.

The takeaways

  • Registration is required to sue for infringement — otherwise it’s passing off.
  • Many combinations infringe — identity/similarity of mark and goods, reputed marks, trade names, advertising.
  • Three remedy tracks — civil (injunction, Anton Piller, damages), criminal, and administrative.
  • Vigilance is essential — the onus is on owners to watch and act.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a registered trademark to sue for infringement? Yes — registration is a prerequisite for an infringement action; without it, you rely on passing off.

Who can sue for trademark infringement in India? The registered proprietor, their legal heirs, registered users and assignees.

What remedies are available? Civil (temporary injunction, Anton Piller order, damages, account of profits), criminal (complaints, which can run alongside civil), and administrative (opposition/removal via the Registry).

Who bears the burden of proof? The plaintiff — who must prove the essential features were copied and that deception is likely.

Legislation referred to

  • The Trade Marks Act, 1999

Related reading