Insights

Can You Register a Signature as a Trademark in India?

Section 2(m) expressly includes a signature in the definition of a mark. But a plainly written name won't get through — a signature needs a distinctive style, or proof of acquired distinctiveness, as Sachin Tendulkar and Katrina Kaif's filings show.

Published 5 June 2015 · Updated 14 August 2026 · Reviewed by Selvam & Selvam

Most of us have a signature we’d like to think is uniquely ours. Indian trademark law agrees that a signature can function as a mark — it says so expressly. Whether your signature can be registered is a different question, and it turns on how distinctive it actually looks.

The statutory position

The definition of a “mark” in Section 2(m) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is broad, and includes a device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral, shape of goods, packaging or combination of colours — or any combination of these.

So a signature is squarely within the definition. Registering one grants exclusive rights, which means you can stop others from using it.

Read sensibly, a signature mark authenticates not a writing but a particular product — assuring customers that these are the goods or services of the person they were looking for, and not somebody else’s.

Where signatures actually earn their keep

The commercial case is clearest in fashion and luxury. Established designers routinely brand clothing, jewellery or shoes by placing their signature somewhere on the product, and consumers buy precisely because they associate the signature with that designer.

Which is also where the risk lives. A simple signature widens the scope for an unauthorised third party to sell knock-offs by literally signing off their products as yours. To be genuinely capable of distinguishing, a signature should be written in a distinctive style and should not read simply as a name.

Will yours be registered?

Two obstacles are worth being honest about.

A plainly written name won’t do. Merely writing your name in a non-stylised, non-distinct manner will be rejected — it isn’t capable of distinguishing your goods from anyone else’s. Writing your name in capitals or in perfect script has the same problem, and additionally makes it easier for infringers to adopt your mark, pass their products off as yours, and ride on your reputation.

Acquired distinctiveness is the way in. Signatures, like surnames, are the kind of mark that can acquire distinctiveness. Even a mark that is essentially just a name can be registered on proof of use establishing that consumers have come to associate it with a single source.

That is how simple signatures get through. Sachin Tendulkar and Katrina Kaif both have relatively plain signatures, and have managed to get applications registered or advertised — on the strength of the reputation behind them, not the calligraphy.

So is it worth doing?

Candidly: unless you are a celebrity able to monetise that status, or your signature genuinely operates as a brand element on your products, the case is thin. For a designer whose signature appears on every piece, it is valuable and worth protecting. For most people, a signature is a means of authenticating documents — not a badge of trade origin, which is what registration protects.

Where this fits now. Signature marks sit alongside a broader body of law on personality rights that Indian courts have developed considerably since — protecting a person’s name, image, voice and likeness against unauthorised commercial use. A registered signature mark is one useful component of that protection, not the whole of it.

The takeaways

  • Section 2(m) expressly includes signatures in the definition of a mark.
  • A plainly written name will be refused — it can’t distinguish your goods.
  • Distinctive styling helps; acquired distinctiveness works — shown through proof of use.
  • Most valuable where the signature brands the product — as in fashion and luxury goods.

Frequently asked questions

Can a signature be registered as a trademark in India? Yes — Section 2(m) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 expressly includes a signature within the definition of a mark.

Will any signature be accepted? No — a name written in a non-stylised, non-distinctive way will be refused for not being capable of distinguishing the applicant’s goods or services.

How can a plain signature still be registered? Through acquired distinctiveness, shown by proof of use establishing that consumers associate the signature with a single source.

Why do designers register their signatures? Because the signature on the product is what consumers rely on to identify the designer — making it a genuine badge of origin worth protecting against knock-offs.

Useful official resources